For years, abortion-rights advocates have used the First Amendment as a weapon to challenge laws that require doctors to display an ultrasound or describe a fetus in detail to a patient.
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday on a California law that forces licensed pregnancy-counseling clinics that promote childbirth as an alternative to tell patients they might be eligible for free or discounted abortions. Pregnancy centers say they are being compelled to advertise a procedure they abhor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48391/48391dc3a3d6207b1283964bb5db84f82e84ebd0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35689/356890753ec7ecdedc7a8159c49e923c16b0b131" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cff09/cff0971e6071a60fe1a4912290d00fd058864f92" alt=""
"The government cannot gerrymander a law to target disfavored speakers, and it cannot require Americans to promote messages that violate their convictions," said Kristen Waggoner, an Alliance Defending Freedom lawyer who represents the centers.