The case of Frank Mir vs. USADA has been an interesting one, to say the least. From Frank’s original claims about tainted kangaroo meat, to his recent allegations that USADA is using debunked tests, there’s a lot to parse here. I’m going to break down each of his recent claims and examine the evidence behind them.
Claim one: Mir said that he was originally told his February 5 sample was clear, only to be later told it actually tested positive for the DHCMT metabolite.
'It is frustrating to now be told that USADA has changed their mind about the February 5 test, claiming that the sample they once cleared is now clouded with the same trace metabolite.