Note: After posting this (Not Hank) Aaron pointed out that he had a nearly identical post two years ago. As hard as it may be to believe, I did not have his post in mind as I wrote this. Nevertheless, I'll leave my post up as an example of how easy it is to refute such easily researched fallacies.
At this point we all know that there is a non-insignificant block of Hall of Fame voters who will not vote for Bagwell because of suspected PED use. And we all know that this suspicion is backed up by no proof whatsoever.