Recently, I ran an article on Pace’s midterm grades. Readers suggested that looking at Emery’s drafts with the same process might be illuminating, so that’s what this article does. It follows the same methodology as the previous piece (go check it out), so I’ll only review the approach briefly here:
I am evaluating judgment shown by the GM in selecting these players instead of the players themselves, and each pick will be judged in three categories: the value of the position picked where it was made for the team in question, how well the GM did at finding what should have been a good player at that position, and how the player actually performed.