Zach Lowe suggests in a deep dive on this summer’s superstar pairings that having a Big Two rather than a Big Three might be the best long-term solution for teams bent on long-term contention.
Having a Big Three has long been the ticket to Finals contention but with rising salaries —and rising prices for acquiring such stars, that may go out of fashion. He writes...
Is this a thing? Will more teams choose two stars and legit depth over a real Big Three? Should they? The question is especially relevant for the Clippers, Lakers, Nets and Mavericks.